bug#77928: Regression in Emacs pretest 31.0.90

Roshan Shariff <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.bugs
Message-ID <CAG8iPGxKOY6RDdNZ--X2pAA0_rb1XEVEu2ZhdOA6Cjrvf14brQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 at 08:20, Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not even sure we all agree that it's a "regression".  That's why I
> asked for opinions in the first place.

I won't go any further, because this is starting to seem Sisyphean.
But I will point out that this bug report has extremely limited reach.
Steven Allen very clearly noticed the change of behaviour, spent a
great deal of time explaining it, and wrote a set of patches to try to
correct it. Andy Moreton and Kristoffer Balintona also thought this
was a regression. It could simply be that they're busy right now,
especially after their earlier efforts didn't get much response (and
the latter two are not specifically CC'd) . Except for Michael
Shields, the patch author, everyone else who has an opinion preferred
the status quo of previous Emacs versions. You yourself just said you
wanted more clarification, which I attempted (and unfortunately,
failed) to provide. I suspect, but of course can't know, that more
people will report this as a bug when Emacs 31 is released.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.