bug#77928: Regression in Emacs pretest 31.0.90
Roshan Shariff <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAG8iPGxKOY6RDdNZ--X2pAA0_rb1XEVEu2ZhdOA6Cjrvf14brQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 at 08:20, Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm not even sure we all agree that it's a "regression". That's why I > asked for opinions in the first place. I won't go any further, because this is starting to seem Sisyphean. But I will point out that this bug report has extremely limited reach. Steven Allen very clearly noticed the change of behaviour, spent a great deal of time explaining it, and wrote a set of patches to try to correct it. Andy Moreton and Kristoffer Balintona also thought this was a regression. It could simply be that they're busy right now, especially after their earlier efforts didn't get much response (and the latter two are not specifically CC'd) . Except for Michael Shields, the patch author, everyone else who has an opinion preferred the status quo of previous Emacs versions. You yourself just said you wanted more clarification, which I attempted (and unfortunately, failed) to provide. I suspect, but of course can't know, that more people will report this as a bug when Emacs 31 is released.