bug#81223: [PATCH] Fix file-missing error during async native compilation
Stéphane Marks <[email protected]> Fri, 7 Aug 2026 16:47:20 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAN+1Hbr+PWJ32Xb1Mpj7H8h+tCQjUtMxp=OvZu9fsi05Aqr8aw@mail.gmail.com> |
Even I can still be verbose after a couple of years of steady contributions. If I'd received comments to that expansive commit message, I'd have made requested changes. In that commit's case, it was pushed by Yuan, not a core maintainer, but the maintainer of treesit. The core maintainers surely dislike that commit. On Fri, Aug 7, 2026 at 10:41 AM James Cherti <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Stephane, > > I am not against comments. I remember in one of my first > contributions, Eli Z. modified my commit message himself, > merged it, and then told me that he recommended writing > commit messages similar to those of other Emacs > contributors. > > I prefer this practice over nitpicking small details and > making addressing them a condition for merging. > > By the way, it looks like this "convention" that you do not > consider nitpicking does not apply to you (there are several > other long commits by other maintainers and contributors): > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > commit 060451d6e0b3c91882c62ae1a574125c1f448487 > Author: Stéphane Marks <[email protected]> > Date: 2026-04-30 15:34:23 -0400 > > treesit-explore-mode usability improvements (bug#80935) > > Improve the usability of treesit-explore-mode. > > - Prompt for the primary parser first, if there is one, rather > than the first in the list reported by 'treesit-parser-list'. > Previously, in a multi-parser buffer like 'markdown-ts-mode', one > had to hunt for the primary parser. > > - Kill the tree buffer and its window if the source buffer is > killed or 'treesit-explore-mode'. Previously, when > 'treesit-explore-mode' is disabled in the source buffer, its > companion explorer tree buffer was left dangling and window > open (with an unrelated buffer). > > - Improve 'treesit--explorer-refresh-1' to recenter the window > around the selected nodes when the selected region in the source > buffer changes. Previously, one had to navigate manually to find > the corresponding highlighted node in the tree window which may > be far away from that the source buffer's region represents. > > - Disable 'treesit-explore-mode' in the source buffer if its > companion tree buffer is killed. Previously, > 'treesit-explore-mode' remained active in the source buffer in > an effectively unusable state. > > - Disable 'treesit-explore-mode' if the user quits > 'completing-read' in 'treesit-explorer-switch-parser' when > enabling the mode. Previously, 'treesit-explore-mode' was left > enabled after quit. > > - New command to switch back and forth between the source buffer > and tree buffer windows to make navigating more convenient. > Previously, in a multi-window frame, one had to navigate to/from > these two related windows in a more cumbersome way. > > - New command to quit 'treesit-explore-mode' and > 'treesit--explorer-tree-mode' and handle buffer and window > cleanup. > > * lisp/treesit.el (treesit--explorer-refresh-1): Recenter the > window, if amenable, to the node selected in the source buffer. > (treesit--explorer-kill-explorer-buffer): Remove function. > (treesit--explorer-generate-parser-alist): Prioritize the > primary parser, if there is one. > (treesit--explorer-tree-mode-cleanup): New defun. > (treesit-explore-quit): New command. > (treesit-explorer-tree-window): New defun. > (treesit-explorer-source-buffer-window): New defun. > (treesit-explore-mode-map): Revise key bindings. > (treesit--explorer-tree-mode-map): Revise key bindings. > (treesit--explorer-tree-mode): New keymap. > (treesit-explorer-switch-parser): Add a default to > completing-read. > (treesit-explore-mode): Guard completing read quit. Wire up the > new cleanup functions. > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > > -- > James Cherti > GitHub: https://github.com/jamescherti > Website: https://www.jamescherti.com/ > > On 2026-08-07 10:25, Stéphane Marks wrote: > > I think of it more as tips to condition my muscle memory to hew closer > > to accepted conventions. That said, what makes you think that the > > maintainers do not provide input, perhaps privately, to those who have > > commit rights and can use said input to improve their commits? > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2026 at 10:20 AM James Cherti <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > I checked the Emacs git log, and many recent commit messages > > are quite long (including those written by the maintainers > > themselves). What is the actual standard here? A standard > > should apply to everyone equally. > > > > While standards and conventions are important, excessive > > criticism can make contributors hesitate to submit patches. > > > > This feels like nitpicking. > > > > -- > > James Cherti > > GitHub: https://github.com/jamescherti < > https://github.com/jamescherti> > > Website: https://www.jamescherti.com/ <https://www.jamescherti.com/> > > > > On 2026-08-07 09:56, Stéphane Marks wrote: > > > As a community, we should value maintainer input and attention to > > detail > > > for the conventions that make it easier to perform a maintainer's > > job. > > > When each of us regular contributors triages a potential issue, > > we also > > > benefit. This isn't a hobgoblin of little minds consistency, > > this is > > > thoughtful consistency. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2026 at 9:48 AM James Cherti > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > > <mailto:[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Sean and Phillip, > > > > > > Please don't make it difficult to contribute to Emacs. > > > > > > I would appreciate it if we focused on the core changes > > > rather than nitpicking. > > > > > > The latest patch already includes comments that are clear > > > enough and is ready to be merged. > > > > > > On 2026-08-07 06:45, Sean Whitton wrote: > > > > James Cherti [06/Aug 7:20pm -04] wrote: > > > >> Subject: [PATCH] Fix file-missing error during async > native > > > compilation (bug#81223) > > > >> > > > >> The async native compilation queue can sometimes retain > stale > > > jobs for > > > >> files that no longer exist on disk (for example, when > > files are > > > removed > > > >> during a package upgrade or deletion). Attempting to > > resolve the > > > target > > > >> .eln filename for these missing files signals a file- > > missing error. > > > > > > > > Please remove this or move it into comments. We prefer > > not to have > > > > extensive commentary in commit messages, see CONTRIBUTE. > > > > > > > >> * lisp/emacs-lisp/comp-run.el (comp--run-async-workers): > > Verify > > > source > > > >> files exist before attempting to resolve their .eln paths > > in the > > > >> dispatch loop. In the process sentinel, wrap the > compilation > > > block in a > > > >> condition-case to catch file-missing errors and prevent > the > > > async worker > > > >> queue from stalling. > > > > > > > > Possibly this could be made shorter too, but it's less > > important. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > James Cherti > > > GitHub: https://github.com/jamescherti <https://github.com/ > > jamescherti> <https://github.com/jamescherti <https://github.com/ > > jamescherti>> > > > Website: https://www.jamescherti.com/ <https:// > > www.jamescherti.com/> <https://www.jamescherti.com/ <https:// > > www.jamescherti.com/>> > > > > > > > > > > > > >