bug#81406: 31.0.90; rotate-windows loses window balance when window-combination-resize is t
Stéphane Marks <[email protected]> Fri, 7 Aug 2026 16:50:40 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAN+1HbrWy8zN4A-f-7AbjVXq=ToLxDeHfwuwCnh+bEc=SC6eRA@mail.gmail.com> |
On Fri, Aug 7, 2026 at 10:47 AM Pranshu <[email protected]> wrote: > > I disagree, dedicated windows are windows that are dedicated to one > > buffer, but that dosn't mean you can do stuff like split them or even > > change their size. rotate-windows is an exception, it seems like it's > > moving the buffers around, but actually it's destroying and recreating > > the window tree from scratch, so it gives the wrong impressoin. The > > other window-x don't have this issue, they're pretty clear about that > > they do. Since dedicated windows are splittable, there's no reason why > > they shouldn't be transposable etc. > > For a better analogy: Imagine a window is a person, and a buffer is > the person's soul (etc their personality and memories). A dedicated > window is a person whose body is exclusive to their soul. On the > outside, rotate-windows looks like it swaps people's souls and bodys > but the people stand exactly where they were, just their souls > changed. But in reality, rotate-windows changes the person's body and > soul and moves them around to make it look like souls were swapped. > The other window commmands for example flip windows, simply relocates > people in predicatable way to have the people standing northmost go to > the southmost point. > I've always taken a window dedicated to its buffer to be precisely that and nothing more; i.e., no expectations of the window being fixed in space. I have only two dedicated windows I use daily and in a tab-bar tab that is "locked" from being closed (that contribution coming in Emacs 32 along with several other tab-bar improvements).