Re: How large is the difference between the SF cedet and Emacs cedet (melpa)?

Hi Vladimir,

Mainline Emacs version of CEDET has moved past CEDET on sourceforge due 
to major changes to eieio.  At this point it is not possible to use SF 
version with newer Emacsen.

I have been posting minor patches to Emacs for missing features from SF 
version, but it is slow going as I have limited time, and I don't have a 
continous release from my company.  Eventually I'd like to move some of 
the tools not in Emacs into melpa after updating them to work with newer 
Emacs, but it will be a while without help.

Eric

On 1/12/20 1:11 AM, Vladimir Nikishkin wrote:
> I am reading the built-in Emacs CEDET manuals, and they are apparently
> refencing some CEDET features that are not within a standard Emacs
> installation. (For example, cogre is not there. Also the manual
> references the grammar-fw info node, which is also not present.)
> How large is the difference? Is it worth installing a git version of
> cedet for everyday usage (not for development)?
> 
> You know, org-mode is also generally divergent from the main Emacs
> tree, but they maintain a separate MELPA repository, which allows to
> have a "semi-fresh" org installation without interfering with Emacs
> proper.  Maybe it is worth making a melpa repository with the latest
> CEDET?
>