Re: How large is the difference between the SF cedet and Emacs cedet (melpa)?
Vladimir Nikishkin <[email protected]> Thu, 16 Jan 2020 11:15:25 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.cedet |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+A2iZY6KJOXcmbPQjYO=qiXwrRbiv9onCMV-E-g77_ND7Kpqw@mail.gmail.com> |
--===============8494704786625346381== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000065e714059c393d22" --00000000000065e714059c393d22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, I'm sort of trying to use the sf version now, and it's actually working with scheme files better than the built-in one (due to the last scheme-related commit?). (In the sense that it doesn't throw exceptions.) It can't do a lot more though. Which tools are still not there? The grammars-fw manual and cogre at least... Eric Ludlam <[email protected]> =E6=96=BC 2020=E5=B9=B41=E6=9C=8816=E6= =97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E5=9B=9B 10:47 =E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Hi Vladimir, > > Mainline Emacs version of CEDET has moved past CEDET on sourceforge due > to major changes to eieio. At this point it is not possible to use SF > version with newer Emacsen. > > I have been posting minor patches to Emacs for missing features from SF > version, but it is slow going as I have limited time, and I don't have a > continous release from my company. Eventually I'd like to move some of > the tools not in Emacs into melpa after updating them to work with newer > Emacs, but it will be a while without help. > > Eric > > On 1/12/20 1:11 AM, Vladimir Nikishkin wrote: > > I am reading the built-in Emacs CEDET manuals, and they are apparently > > refencing some CEDET features that are not within a standard Emacs > > installation. (For example, cogre is not there. Also the manual > > references the grammar-fw info node, which is also not present.) > > How large is the difference? Is it worth installing a git version of > > cedet for everyday usage (not for development)? > > > > You know, org-mode is also generally divergent from the main Emacs > > tree, but they maintain a separate MELPA repository, which allows to > > have a "semi-fresh" org installation without interfering with Emacs > > proper. Maybe it is worth making a melpa repository with the latest > > CEDET? > > > --00000000000065e714059c393d22 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <div dir=3D"auto"><div>Well, I'm sort of trying to use the sf version n= ow, and it's actually working with scheme files better than the built-i= n one (due to the last scheme-related commit?). (In the sense that it doesn= 't throw exceptions.) It can't do a lot more though.</div><div dir= =3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Which tools are still not there?</div= ><div dir=3D"auto">The grammars-fw manual and cogre at least...</div><div d= ir=3D"auto"><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote" dir=3D"auto"><div dir=3D"ltr= " class=3D"gmail_attr">Eric Ludlam <<a href=3D"mailto:eric@siege-engine.= com">[email protected]</a>> =E6=96=BC 2020=E5=B9=B41=E6=9C=8816=E6= =97=A5 =E9=80=B1=E5=9B=9B 10:47 =E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A<br></div><block= quote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc= solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Vladimir,<br> <br> Mainline Emacs version of CEDET has moved past CEDET on sourceforge due <br= > to major changes to eieio.=C2=A0 At this point it is not possible to use SF= <br> version with newer Emacsen.<br> <br> I have been posting minor patches to Emacs for missing features from SF <br= > version, but it is slow going as I have limited time, and I don't have = a <br> continous release from my company.=C2=A0 Eventually I'd like to move so= me of <br> the tools not in Emacs into melpa after updating them to work with newer <b= r> Emacs, but it will be a while without help.<br> <br> Eric<br> <br> On 1/12/20 1:11 AM, Vladimir Nikishkin wrote:<br> > I am reading the built-in Emacs CEDET manuals, and they are apparently= <br> > refencing some CEDET features that are not within a standard Emacs<br> > installation. (For example, cogre is not there. Also the manual<br> > references the grammar-fw info node, which is also not present.)<br> > How large is the difference? Is it worth installing a git version of<b= r> > cedet for everyday usage (not for development)?<br> > <br> > You know, org-mode is also generally divergent from the main Emacs<br> > tree, but they maintain a separate MELPA repository, which allows to<b= r> > have a "semi-fresh" org installation without interfering wit= h Emacs<br> > proper.=C2=A0 Maybe it is worth making a melpa repository with the lat= est<br> > CEDET?<br> > <br> </blockquote></div></div></div> --00000000000065e714059c393d22-- --===============8494704786625346381== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============8494704786625346381== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Cedet-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cedet-devel --===============8494704786625346381==--