Re: reading LLM code may rule out white room re-implementation; was: On keybindings and the slow erosion of help's utility

> From: "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]>,  Sean Whitton
>  <[email protected]>,  Stefan Monnier <[email protected]>,
>  [email protected]
> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2026 06:48:53 +0200
> 
> Jean Louis <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > On 2026-07-17 18:03, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> > Yet one thing is seriously important and forgotten, that such legal
> > concerns are valid only if underlying datasets used to train LLM are
> > non-free.
> 
> This is only guaranteed if by "free" you mean that they are in the
> public domain.
> 
> > Today there are millions of LLMs and many of some important models
> > have been trained on fully free datasets, thus using such represents
> > one of legal solutions.
> 
> Please show an example of a practically usable LLM that is only trained
> on public domain works.

Please drop this off-topic discussion, both of you.  You have been
asked already to take it elsewhere.  The reasons why we ask not to
post LLM-generated code were already explained, and we respectfully
ask not argue about them here.

If someone still posts to this thread, I urge all the others to resist
temptation and not reply.

TIA