Re: LLM Commit in upstream `master`?!

> From: Thanos Apollo <[email protected]>
> Cc: Divya Ranjan Pattanaik <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2026 16:45:22 +0300
> 
> Arsen Arsenović <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Thanos Apollo <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >> Is it ok to stop the luddite paranoia with LLMs now?
> >
> > The Luddites were right.
> 
> They were so right that 'Luddite' became synonymous with clear-sighted
> technological foresight.
> 
> > That said, the Luddites concerns do not apply to LLMs, so this kind of
> > comparison is not really applicable.
> >
> > The concern with LLMs is about the legal status of their output, and
> > this concern is not yet resolved to my awareness.
> 
> And yet an Emacs contributor has just pushed a commit co-authored by
> Claude.  I suppose the next step is to screen-record every contributor,
> lest someone use one of these tools without properly confessing it.

Please stop this discussion.  It is off-topic here.

I urge everyone not to respond to off-topic posts here.  The only
on-topic posts are those by Sean and Yuan when they discuss why this
happened and how to fix it.