Re: Writing instructions for LLM s (don’t generate code) into CONTRIBUTE?

--J27UOMg6mCmQAZlo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 11:21:34AM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide [05/Aug 12:19pm +02] wrote:

[...]

> > That sounds like it doesn=E2=80=99t materially differ from AGENTS.md --=
 but
> > avoids giving the indication that we want LLM contributions to the code.
> >
> > We need someone to check whether adding the LLM-text to CONTRIBUTE
> > causes common LLMs to adhere to it.
>=20
> We're not going to rely on this, we have AGENTS.md now.

I think I've read that statement for the third time now.

I feel pretty uneasy to watch how this is being pushed
through, but perhaps that's me.

If anyone believes at this point that the "main LLM"
operator's interests aling in /any/ way with ours, I'll
call them na=C3=AFve.

But hey.
--=20
t

--J27UOMg6mCmQAZlo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EABECAB0WIQRp53liolZD6iXhAoIFyCz1etHaRgUCanMRzAAKCRAFyCz1etHa
RuLtAJwKoFkZOcLNmFbt+kQMNt7st7AdWgCZASaICNk1JA1cLmWIoArH0ITMxp0=
=4p64
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--J27UOMg6mCmQAZlo--