Re: Re: No way.
David Kastrup <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:12:47 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.latex.preview.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ralf Angeli <[email protected]> writes: > * David Kastrup (2005-02-23) writes: > >> Ralf Angeli <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Icons with some plasticity as the ones above would give >>> preview-latex a look which is a bit more modern. (Is the color cell >>> problem still an issue?) >> >> I don't know. Anyway, the error icon does not need to look nice. It >> is supposed to stand out. And traffic signs _are_ flat. > > So what? If this would be about realism, you could just get > outside, shoot a photo of such a sign and put that in. Much too low contrast, bad digitization artifacts. > (In the larger versions you could stand beside the sign and make a > grim face.) > >> Maybe I should add a one-pixel border of desaturized red (strictly >> speaking something like grey20, but since most backgrounds will >> probably be light, grey40 might be better) around the sign to make it >> blend better with weakly colored backgrounds. That would take the >> edge off somewhat. > > Most of the Gnome 1.x XPM icons had sharp black borders (see > <URL:http://web.archive.org/web/20000817013044/tigert.gimp.org/gnome/gnome-stock/>) > and many of the current ones have, too (though not that sharp). That won't help me against digitization artifacts. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click