Re: xemacs wiki

"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> writes:

> The sources you need to look at are the XEmacs Texinfo sources, which
> clearly state their own license.

But we got that license from older FSF, right?  We didn't just invent
it, because we clearly inherit the docs from older GNU Emacs and it
would have been illegal to change the license without their agreement.

Saying that we use an "XEmacs doc license" without further
qualification confuses people into thinking that we perversely
invented our own documentation license.  That's what I wanted to
correct, at least for the sake of people like Eli and Alex who are
following the discussion.