Re: [lawrence mitchell] Re: [PATCH] erc: make erc-generate-log-file-name-long and erc-log-file-coding-system xemacs-compatible
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.xemacs.design |
|---|---|
| Organization | The XEmacs Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "APA" == Adrian Aichner <[email protected]> writes: APA> what is the right way to specify a catch-all coding system in APA> Mule and non-Mule XEmacs, supporting XEmacs 21.1 and later? >> What's the right thing to do, considering XEmacs can be built >> without Mule support? APA> How about something like: (if (featurep 'mule) 'emacs-mule ; or some other catchall 'buffer-file-coding-system) I'm not up to speed on XEmacs' coding-system design, so I'm not sure if emacs-mule would be the right choice. Does another catch-all coding-system exist? Ditto for non-mule XEmacsen. > The other hunks are clean and easy. I'll apply these tomorrow if no-one comes up with any objections. [...] -- lawrence mitchell <[email protected]> ---------- -- Adrian Aichner mailto:[email protected] http://www.xemacs.org/ -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.