Re: license change of emacswiki.org

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.emacs.xemacs.design
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:41:38 +0100, Alex Schroeder <[email protected]>  said:
> Unless I get further feedback, the Emacs Wiki license will be changed
> from the FDL to the following:
> 
>     "This work is licensed to you under version 2 of the GNU General
>     Public License. Alternatively, you may choose to receive this work
>     under any other license that grants the right to use, copy,
>     modify, and/or distribute the work, as long as that license
>     imposes the restriction that derivative works have to grant the
>     same rights and impose the same restriction. For example, you may
>     choose to receive this work under the GNU Free Documentation
>     License, the CreativeCommons ShareAlike License, or the XEmacs
>     manual license."
> 
> Does this satisfy the people on this list?

Quite often, the fact that the Linux kernel effectively can't be relicensed
due to the problems of getting all copyright holders to agree is mentioned.

Is there a similar issue for all the people who have contributed to the
emacs wiki under the FDL?
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 226 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001

iD8DBQE/6nPUcC3lWbTT17ARAk9hAJ9kUxMzQ2vLhJwkH7y1XH1iMd4UvwCfa59c
fi/KdhXKSGDHyb9sYYwP4xk=
=B75H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.