Re: [comp.emacs.xemacs] Re: removing efs to get tramp working?

Kai Grossjohann <[email protected]> writes:

> Michael Albinus <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> - It makes NO sense to introduce URL notation just for XEmacs. If
>>   used, it must be agreed with the Emacs maintainers. Who would be
>>   able to get it?
>
> IIRC, it was judged nice to have but not essential.

Nevertheless, todays' exploitation of Tramp seems to be larger. It
is/will be packaged with both XEmacs and Emacs.

Changing the syntax is such a break that it should be done with
obvious advantage only. Unification of syntax would count. Moving to
URL syntax for XEmacs only wouldn't be worth the trouble, I believe.

> Kai

Best regards, Michael.