Re: announcing synfl, the next generation of fontlock
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[email protected]> Wed, 12 May 2004 17:01:21 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.emacs.semantic,gmane.emacs.xemacs.design |
|---|---|
| Organization | The XEmacs Project |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
>>>>> "David" == David PONCE <[email protected]> writes: David> FYI, Semantic lexical analysis and parsing tasks don't David> depend on EIEIO. Semantic include "wisent", a port of David> Bison 1.3 to Elisp, so benefits of a well known LALR parser David> framework. Ah ... I see, the merge happened about the time I started fiddling with this stuff, when I was too busy to spend much time seeing what was happening in the real world for something that was basically a toy for me. In that case, I don't see any particular reason why serious users of parser technology would be interested in synfl at this point; there are a lot of advantages to sticking with the tried-and-true. Not to mention that the wisent parser is undoubtedly a lot better optimized. By the way, it was pretty damn rude of you to strip ONLY the xemacs-design address, given that the thread was cross-posted from there, and cedet users presumably already know how semantic works. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3