Re: Could have known
Herman De Wael <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I was in fact referring to L23 Herman (egg off-face) Richard Hills schreef: > WarGames: > > "Is this a game or is it real?" > > "What's the difference?" > > So-called Could Have Known Law 73F: > > ".....a false inference from a remark, manner, tempo, or the like,....." > > Richard Hills: > > In my opinion a corrected revoke is not "like" a deceptive question or > hesitating with a singleton. Hence I believe Herman's assertion that > "the Law is clear" is accurate; alas with egg-on-face that Herman has > not yet correctly parsed the clear Law 73F. > > Best wishes, > > Richard Hills > > On Saturday, May 21, 2016, Tony Musgrove <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] <javascript:;> > [mailto:[email protected] <javascript:;>] On > > Behalf Of Herman De Wael > > Sent: Saturday, 21 May 2016 5:46 PM > > To: Bridge Laws Mailing List > > Subject: Re: [BLML] Could have known > > > > > > > > Tony Musgrove schreef: > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> Herman. > > > Thank you Herman, the reason is that in OZ, the players > > > would recognise a genuine error with no malice intended > > > and go on to the next board (in my limited experience of > > > playing with the big boys) > > > > > > > Strange. > > > > Where I play, any player who finds himself down in a contract > after an > > opponent misled him tries to get the contract back from the TD. > > And the Law is clear: "could have known", not "knew". > > > > But I understand your point. Just make it "no problem in this > > tournament" rather than "in OZ", which suggested to me that the laws > > are > > different up there. > > We are down here from up there, and the South protagonist > was actually European, while the EW were OZ extra > good players, > Cheers > Tony (Sydney) > > > [] > > > > > Herman. > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Tony (Sydney) > > > > > > [] > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Blml mailing list > > > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Blml mailing list > > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml > > > _______________________________________________ > Blml mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:;> > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml > > > > _______________________________________________ > Blml mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml > _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml