Re: Could have known
Peter Smulders <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> >From: Herman De Wael <[email protected]> >Precedence: list >MIME-Version: 1.0 >To: Bridge Laws Mailing List <[email protected]> >References: <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > <CAGZGHAj=wYyqGQkbo0jgyPUChzzdpngjDso1RauoL_Eatv-rWQ@mail.gmail.com> >In-Reply-To: ><CAGZGHAj=wYyqGQkbo0jgyPUChzzdpngjDso1RauoL_Eatv-rWQ@mail.gmail.com> >Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 10:47:32 +0200 >Reply-To: Bridge Laws Mailing List <[email protected]> >Message-ID: <[email protected]> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >Subject: Re: [BLML] Could have known >Message: 4 > >I was in fact referring to L23 >Herman (egg off-face) And how about L12B1? The objective of score adjustment is to redress damage to a nonoffending side and to take away any advantage gained by an offending side through its infraction. Damage exists when, because of an infraction, an innocent side obtains a table result less favourable than would have been the expectation had the infraction not occurred but see C1(b). _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml