Re: Change of call after illegal call
"Tony Musgrove" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Timothy N. Hill > Sent: Friday, 15 July 2016 5:46 PM > To: Bridge Laws Mailing List > Subject: Re: [BLML] Change of call after illegal call > > On 2016 Jul 13, at 07:44, Matthias Berghaus <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Am 13.07.2016 um 11:26 schrieb Tony Musgrove: > > > >> ... suppose I double partner (illegal, but have seen him play before :)) > ... > > As a player I’ve seen a joke inadmissible double a few times (“I eked out a > minimum raise, partner took me seriously, and I’ve seen partner play > before”), but I don’t recall ever taking a director call on one of these. > > > ... [Law] 26 could apply (anybody got an example where 26 would > apply?) ... > > Sure. I’ve taken perhaps a dozen director calls over the years for > inadmissible doubles. They’re usually takeout requests showing the > unbid suits. Sometimes they’re redundant penalty doubles (a bid too far, > Double, Pass, Double). Law 26 applies, but how? > > Here’s one I remember well: One Diamond, Pass, Double (for takeout), > “Director, please,” responder’s inadmissible Double changed to One > Spade, Pass, Pass (mandatory), Two Hearts, All Pass. > > 26A2 should be clearer about the lead restrictions after offender’s > withdrawn call specified two or three suits and his legal calls specified > one or two, but not all, of those suits. Following what I think is the > intended meaning, the first time opener was on lead I allowed declarer to > require or prohibit a diamond or to require or prohibit a heart. > > Opener had a 19-HCP 4=3=2=4 and responder an 8-HCP 5=4=1=3. The > room went down one in four spades. Our heroes got the only plus score. > No reason to apply Law 23. Score up a top. :) > > I’ve usually judged a redundant penalty double as not “solely related to a > specified suit or suits” (26B), but I suppose some redundant penalty > doubles could be lead-directing (26A). > > Tim using written bidding as in most of my clubs in OZ, it sometimes occurs that player don’t know how to write redouble! Cheers, Tony (Sydney) [] _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml