Re: Change of call after illegal call

"Tony Musgrove" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.games.bridge.laws
Message-ID <[email protected]>
 
> I’ve usually judged a redundant penalty double as not “solely related to a
> specified suit or suits” (26B), but I suppose some redundant penalty
> doubles could be lead-directing (26A).
> 
> 	Tim

 
Sorry, my previous reply hard to decipher without some
context.  The bidding had been

1C   1H   x   x (then pass substituted)

 the player had originally intended to redouble
not having noticed the 1C opening bid on her
left.  I allowed her to substitute any call with
her partner barred.

Cheers,

Tony (Sydney)


_______________________________________________
Blml mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.