Re: Equity - some questions

"Sven Pran" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.games.bridge.laws
Message-ID <[email protected]>
An adjusted score is of course a sanction, but it shall never be used as a
penalty.

When  you say that A- is a penalty (like 10% of a top) then what do you say
that A+ is - a bonus?

> Herman De Wael
> Of course A- is a sanction. The expected value of a board is 50%, so if
you get
> 40%, that is a sanction.
> I agree wholeheartedly with those here ho argue that the two pairs are not
> treated equally, and saying that they get the same penalty is just
covering up
> tactics.
> I would, in this case, either give 50% to the second pair and a penalty to
both
> sides, or give a penalty only to one pair so as not to have to explain to
the totally
> innocent third pair why their opponents get 50% hen clearly at fault.
> Herman.
> 
> Martin Sinot wrote:
> > I don't agree. The pair now getting A- is not penalized, bur rectified.
> > After all, they can no longer obtain a score on the deal, so the TD
> > must give them one, and since it is their own fault, it will be A-.
> > That is a matter of rectification. The other pair already had a legal
> > score, so they keep it. In addition both pairs can be given a PP,
> > which normally will be equal for both pairs (unless of course the TD
> > finds one pair more at fault than the other, but that seems unlikely
> > here). So yes, both pairs are equally sanctioned (because the A- is not
a
> sanction).
> >
> > regards
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Blml mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
_______________________________________________
Blml mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.