Re: Equity - some questions
"Sven Pran" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
An adjusted score is of course a sanction, but it shall never be used as a penalty. When you say that A- is a penalty (like 10% of a top) then what do you say that A+ is - a bonus? > Herman De Wael > Of course A- is a sanction. The expected value of a board is 50%, so if you get > 40%, that is a sanction. > I agree wholeheartedly with those here ho argue that the two pairs are not > treated equally, and saying that they get the same penalty is just covering up > tactics. > I would, in this case, either give 50% to the second pair and a penalty to both > sides, or give a penalty only to one pair so as not to have to explain to the totally > innocent third pair why their opponents get 50% hen clearly at fault. > Herman. > > Martin Sinot wrote: > > I don't agree. The pair now getting A- is not penalized, bur rectified. > > After all, they can no longer obtain a score on the deal, so the TD > > must give them one, and since it is their own fault, it will be A-. > > That is a matter of rectification. The other pair already had a legal > > score, so they keep it. In addition both pairs can be given a PP, > > which normally will be equal for both pairs (unless of course the TD > > finds one pair more at fault than the other, but that seems unlikely > > here). So yes, both pairs are equally sanctioned (because the A- is not a > sanction). > > > > regards > > > _______________________________________________ > Blml mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml