Re: Equity, some questions
"Sven Pran" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
ROCAFORT Jean-Pierre I would be surprised if it happened that a movement requested that a pair who had already played that board earlier according to schedule were not scheduled to play it at all during the event. So would indeed also I, but that is not the point; the point is that laws must be written to cater for every possibility. There is a distinct possibility that a pair in an early round (incorrectly) plays a particular board which is not scheduled to be played by that pair at all, for instance because of a scheduled sitout sometime during the event. It is also possible that the same pair (again incorrectly) plays that same board during another round. It would be extremely impractical to have a specific law just for that possibility (and for every other of the 216 possibilities). Fortunately the laws are written in such a way that we don't need to worry about all these extreme possibilities, they are all taken care of in a satisfactory way by the existing laws. _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml