Re: Equity, some questions
Herman De Wael <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Sven Pran wrote: >> Timothy N. Hill >> I don't agree. Cancel the play of the board by the latter pair (82B2), > giving them a >> score of "not played." (Also give both pairs who played the wrong board > the >> same procedural penalty--1/10 of a top or 3 IMPs seems right.) > > [Sven Pran] > I don't know what rules you have for scoring "not played", but the laws > require awarding an artificial adjusted score unless the board is > (correctly) played at a later time or is not scheduled to be played at all. > > Your suggestion has one major flaw: > An adjusted score has impact on all other scores in the field, a procedural > penalty has not. NO, there is no such difference. An (artificail) adjusted score does not affect any other score, since those will be Neubergized regardless of whether the adjustment is via an average or as a non-played. > _______________________________________________ > Blml mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml > > > ----- > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2016.0.7690 / Virus Database: 4627/12738 - Release Date: 08/03/16 > > _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml