Re: Wanted: Alternate wording for Law 16Bb1(a)

"Timothy N. Hill" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.games.bridge.laws
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2016 Jul 24, at 07:25, Richard Hills <[email protected]> wrote:

> Timothy N. Hill suggested, in part:
> 
>> .....If there is a logical alternative, then a player must not choose a call or play that is demonstrably suggested by unauthorized information from his partner.....
> 
> 
> Richard Hills:
> 
> My further suggestion is to make Tim's proposed sentence more generally applicable, by deleting "from his partner”. …

That doesn’t work. “Extraneous Information from Other Sources” (16C) does not and should not tie a player’s hands in the same way that “Extraneous Information from Partner” (16B) does.

     Tim

_______________________________________________
Blml mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.