Re: Equity, some questions
"Timothy N. Hill" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2016 Aug 3, at 10:05, Sven Pran <[email protected]> wrote: > ... I don't know what rules you have for scoring "not played", but the laws require awarding an artificial adjusted score unless the board is (correctly) played at a later time or is not scheduled to be played at all. ... Sven, Law 82B explicitly allows the Director to “cancel the play of a board” (i.e., score it as “not played”) rather than award an adjusted score. To rectify an error in procedure the Director may: 1. award an adjusted score as permitted by these Laws. 2. require, postpone or cancel the play of a board. 3. exercise any other power given to him in these Laws. So I still think, as I originally wrote, > The fairest way to handle the situation in question (moving pairs X and Y play a board that X already played against W and Y is scheduled to play later against Z) is to score the board as not played by Y (see 82B2) > and average-plus for Z (see 15B and 12C2) > and give X and Y a procedural penalty (see 90B7) > of 10% of a top or 3 IMPs (the difference between average and average-minus). Tim _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml