Fwd: Wanted: Alternate wording for Law 16Bb1(a)
Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHkRE_3Y7J4AKZNXYLjgbm0pJRri1xhy9BQ-_zOwk0QcRO6fEw@mail.gmail.com> |
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Steven Willner <[email protected]> Date: Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 2:47 PM Subject: Re: [BLML] Wanted: Alternate wording for Law 16Bb1(a) To: Adam Wildavsky <[email protected]> On 2/7/17 1:22 PM, Adam Wildavsky wrote: > Suppose a player chooses a call suggested over another by UI, and > neither is a LA? > Sorry, I can't reply to the list just now, but the above is why we have L73A1 and 73C. Example: North makes a forcing bid and then says out loud "Don't pass." Pass was never a LA, and L16 doesn't apply, but the Director is free to apply L12C1, judging the probability that South might have passed absent the remark. For this reason, the new wording of L73 needs to be checked. It should refer to an adjusted score, not a penalty, and not mention L16 except perhaps as "see also." Feel free to quote the above to BLML or the Yahoo group if you like. _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml