Re: How careless is careless?
"Sven Pran" <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:36:00 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
West has no reason for claiming before East has led to the next trick other than to safeguard against East leading a Club. "Normal" play by West is to await East's lead and then claim (provided the lead is the spade). East now has received UI from West and I would rule that the contract makes. Sven -----Opprinnelig melding----- Fra: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] På vegne av Tony Musgrove Sendt: fredag 29. september 2017 07.42 Til: BLML <[email protected]> Emne: [BLML] How careless is careless? Playing 3NT, at the antepenultimate trick, E wins and W immediately tables two established spade tricks, claiming 1 down. E has a club and a spade and knows what is going on, and was always going to lead partners set up suit. And she is a "good" player. A club lead allows contract to make. I think maybe RJH would feel constrained to lead a club to punish partner and himself, but otherwise I can only fall back on "careless" (which I have done myself once when I had two cards of the same colour). Declarer says I am wrong to allow the spade lead from West, so have agreed to ask the great and the good, Cheers, Tony (Sydney) _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml