Re: How careless is careless?
"Tony Musgrove" <[email protected]> Sat, 30 Sep 2017 17:48:33 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Steve Willner > Sent: Saturday, 30 September 2017 7:42 AM > To: Bridge Laws Mailing List > Subject: Re: [BLML] How careless is careless? > > On 9/29/2017 5:15 PM, David Grabiner wrote: > > From your facts, it appears that East knows that West has good spades, > > and that the club may not be good (because dummy has a higher club, > or > > declarer is likely to have one). > > I agree that the ruling depends on the cards East can see and on the > play up to that point. > > > If that is the case, leading a club is > > irrational (if you use the claim rule) and not a logical alternative (if > > you use the UI rule), and the defense gets the last two tricks. > > I don't see any UI. The relevant Law seems to be 70A in general and > 70D2 in particular, i.e., is a club from East "normal" or "irrational" > based on East's information and state of mind. The OP said "E ... was > always going to lead partner[']s set up suit," which suggests a club > would have been irrational in the circumstances. If that is not a > "doubtful point (L70A)," then the claim should be allowed. > > I am thinking about a PP to West, probably a warning, but I'm not sure > whether one is appropriate or not. Thanks for your input, all, UI has certainly been given, and a 5 minute sarcasm warning was delivered to West. You or I would have folded cards as declarer and got onto the next disaster, but these two pairs had a history of aggro, so was necessary to be punctilious in my ruling, instead of "stop wasting my time". I was hurt when declarer declared I was wrong, as that has happened twice already this year. Cheers, Tony (Sydney) [] Claiming is entirely proper, but > here West has claimed at a time that makes it impossible for him to > follow L68C, so you could argue it's a violation of procedure. Despite > that, West may have thought East had only spades left. I think I > wouldn't give a PP unless West often does this sort of thing, but I'd > warn him that the ruling could well have gone against him, and that it's > better to let East play before claiming. > _______________________________________________ > Blml mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml