Re: In between Law 23
"Jan Peach" <[email protected]> Sat, 11 Nov 2017 07:23:39 +1000
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <86A45386F30845978A61C7C91FD08BFA@PeachPC> |
Steve: Let A = 15+ any shape and B = weak with 10+ spades. Obviously the _hand types_ A and B are very different. Jan: That is exactly my argument. A and B are very different. Therefore, they cannot be similar. -----Original Message----- From: Steve Willner Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2017 2:43 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BLML] In between Law 23 On 2017-11-09 5:04 PM, I wrote: > If you think an extremely rare possibility -- one that neither an > opponent nor partner will ever allow for -- makes two bids dissimilar, > then we just disagree. A better way of explaining this occurred to me later. Let A = 15+ any shape and B = weak with 10+ spades. Obviously the _hand types_ A and B are very different. However, if you have a call in your system meaning "A or B" and another call meaning "A", those _calls_ are similar because hand type B is for practical purposes nonexistent. That is, B is very close to an empty set. If you don't buy this, I can't think of anything else to say. On a related subject: it appears to me that adjusted scores under L23C can be weighted, and the weights can include actions that might have been indicated by a withdrawn call. Do others agree? This is an important difference from a UI adjustment. _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml