Re: In between Law 23

Gordon Rainsford <[email protected]> Sat, 11 Nov 2017 11:42:24 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.games.bridge.laws
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Steve,

I think your point about weighted scores is correct and has been established in earlier discussions. 

Sent from my iPhone so may be rather brief

> On 10 Nov 2017, at 18:43, Steve Willner <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> On 2017-11-09 5:04 PM, I wrote:
>> If you think an extremely rare possibility -- one that neither an 
>> opponent nor partner will ever allow for -- makes two bids dissimilar, 
>> then we just disagree.
> 
> A better way of explaining this occurred to me later.
> 
> Let A = 15+ any shape and B = weak with 10+ spades.  Obviously the _hand 
> types_ A and B are very different.  However, if you have a call in your 
> system meaning "A or B" and another call meaning "A", those _calls_ are 
> similar because hand type B is for practical purposes nonexistent.  That 
> is, B is very close to an empty set.
> 
> If you don't buy this, I can't think of anything else to say.
> 
> On a related subject: it appears to me that adjusted scores under L23C 
> can be weighted, and the weights can include actions that might have 
> been indicated by a withdrawn call.  Do others agree?  This is an 
> important difference from a UI adjustment.
> _______________________________________________
> Blml mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml
_______________________________________________
Blml mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml