Re: In between Law 23
Gordon Rainsford <[email protected]> Sat, 11 Nov 2017 11:42:24 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Steve, I think your point about weighted scores is correct and has been established in earlier discussions. Sent from my iPhone so may be rather brief > On 10 Nov 2017, at 18:43, Steve Willner <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 2017-11-09 5:04 PM, I wrote: >> If you think an extremely rare possibility -- one that neither an >> opponent nor partner will ever allow for -- makes two bids dissimilar, >> then we just disagree. > > A better way of explaining this occurred to me later. > > Let A = 15+ any shape and B = weak with 10+ spades. Obviously the _hand > types_ A and B are very different. However, if you have a call in your > system meaning "A or B" and another call meaning "A", those _calls_ are > similar because hand type B is for practical purposes nonexistent. That > is, B is very close to an empty set. > > If you don't buy this, I can't think of anything else to say. > > On a related subject: it appears to me that adjusted scores under L23C > can be weighted, and the weights can include actions that might have > been indicated by a withdrawn call. Do others agree? This is an > important difference from a UI adjustment. > _______________________________________________ > Blml mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml