Re: Can a legal non-alert be misinformation anyway?

Steve Willner <[email protected]> Fri, 9 Nov 2018 09:02:24 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.games.bridge.laws
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 2018-11-09 2:34 AM, Herman De Wael wrote:
> considering that a 4Sp response to 4Di van only mean that he
> misunderstood, I believe I should be allowed to bid 5Di.

For me, given that I've always played 4D as natural, 4S would be natural 
and a suggestion to play.  I can imagine for some pairs it would be a 
slam try (control or exclusion BW) if they've agreed that 4D sets 
diamonds as trumps, but that's not an agreement I've ever had.

Regardless, this isn't a Laws issue; it's a normal judgment decision 
about LAs based on the individual circumstances.
_______________________________________________
Blml mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml