Re: Can a legal non-alert be misinformation anyway?
Steve Willner <[email protected]> Fri, 9 Nov 2018 09:02:24 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.bridge.laws |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2018-11-09 2:34 AM, Herman De Wael wrote: > considering that a 4Sp response to 4Di van only mean that he > misunderstood, I believe I should be allowed to bid 5Di. For me, given that I've always played 4D as natural, 4S would be natural and a suggestion to play. I can imagine for some pairs it would be a slam try (control or exclusion BW) if they've agreed that 4D sets diamonds as trumps, but that's not an agreement I've ever had. Regardless, this isn't a Laws issue; it's a normal judgment decision about LAs based on the individual circumstances. _______________________________________________ Blml mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtflb.org/mailman/listinfo/blml