Re: GL_ARB_FRAGMENT_PROGRAM vs CG_PROFILE_FP30
"Stephen J Baker" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.devel.opengl |
|---|---|
| Organization | Fat City Network Services, San Diego, California |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Rhadamés Carmona wrote: > Hello Guy > > I tested arb_fragment program and CG fragment program, and the results are > not the same. I kept the rest of the code. CG looks darker. Any clue?. I am > using pre-integration volume rendering with 3D textures. Texture0 and 1 are > the same source 3D texture... texture2 is the dependent 2D texture. Have you compiled the Cg code with the stand-alone compiler and looked at the machine-code it generates? I'm sure that would give you a clue. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The second law of Frisbee throwing states: "Never precede any maneuver by a comment more predictive than "Watch this!"...it turns out that this also applies to writing Fragment Shaders. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Steve Baker (817)619-2657 (Vox/Vox-Mail) L3Com/Link Simulation & Training (817)619-2466 (Fax) Work: [email protected] http://www.link.com Home: [email protected] http://www.sjbaker.org ----- FAQ and OpenGL Resources at: http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Hills/9956/OpenGL -- Author: Stephen J Baker INET: [email protected] Fat City Hosting, San Diego, California -- http://www.fatcity.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [email protected] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB OPENGL-GAMEDEV-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).