Re: The new Buildbot: what’s happ ening, what needs to happen
Thierry Crozat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.devel.scummvm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Colin, I was about to write almost the same thing. This looks like a great idea overall, and thank you for all your work on this. I am however not sure having a buildbot worker for all ports should be a requirement. Can you give your reasoning for this suggestion? I am worried this would be a death sentence for a few ports (you mentioned difficulties with Samsung TV and OS/2, and I have also had difficulties getting mac PPC compilation to work with anything remotely modern). There is probably not many users for those, but I am a bit uncomfortable with killing them if we have porters willing to build those manually. I am a bit less worried for ports on more modern platforms as cross-compilation on Linux seems to be usually well supported. Packaging might be an issue though (I don't know of any way to create a dmg image on Linux for example, which might force us to use zip instead for macOS packages). Thierry > On 18 Dec 2017, at 22:21, Eugene Sandulenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 17 December 2017 at 15:36, Willem Jan Palenstijn <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 09:08:15PM -0600, Colin Snover wrote: > > Team, > > > > One of my goals for the next release of ScummVM is to automate the > > process of building and generating release packages. My hope is that > > this will allow us to have a faster release cycle, more consistent > > release quality, and free up manpower to focus on the many parts of > > ScummVM which cannot be so easily automated (like adding more engines! :)). > > > > The first two major parts of this project are nearly complete: the > > upgrade of Buildbot, and the introduction of infrastructure management > > using Ansible. > > Hi Colin, > > Let me start by saying: Thank you! This is great work, and will really help > keep ScummVM portable and maintainable. I'm very enthusiastic about these > changes. > > In short, I also like the idea, and I see no problem with granting you the needed permissions. > > The only thing which I would like to discuss, is the requirements for every port to have a buildbot instance. I have no real data, but I would be not surprised that in some cases some toolchains will not be easy to install on Linux environment. And of course, I could be wrong in this regard. > > > Eugene > _______________________________________________ > Scummvm-devel mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.scummvm.org/listinfo/scummvm-devel <http://lists.scummvm.org/listinfo/scummvm-devel> _______________________________________________ Scummvm-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.scummvm.org/listinfo/scummvm-devel