Re: time budgets and continuous integration
Jim Tilander <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.devel.sweng |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Definately check out Hudson for CI infrastructure. It was *so* easy > to setup compared to CruiseControl. I had CI builds going for Mac and > PC in about 15 minutes! <http://hudson-ci.org/> Hudson is a Java > application, so it requires Java on the build machine. > > I would disagree, while there are a lot of promising CI packages out there, most of them fail due to the fact that they do not come with source. the CC.NET source code is far from perfect, but it's there and you can modify it. Doing anything outside the beaten path will bring you into the need to make your own plugins. We've written several to fit our development process better. With a close source commercial package you're at the mercy of their whims, or if you can bring pressure on them to implement your changes. /j -- Introspection is just a ladder for people who have dug them an object oriented hole. _______________________________________________ Sweng-Gamedev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.midnightryder.com/listinfo.cgi/sweng-gamedev-midnightryder.com