Re: New shuttle

rsetzer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.all-chat
Message-ID <[email protected]>
And you miss my point. You are tunnel visioned in on one spectacular 
event and pointing to it and shouting Ah-Ha, proof that risk is wrong.



Mark Collins wrote:
>  Mark: No, I'm saying that the Titanic sank and they never built another 
> like
> 
>>it.  IT was not supposed to sink, but it did.
> 
> 
> But they did, and you ignore that. The ocean is full of Titanics. They
> just have different names.
> 
> Mark: You miss my point.  Ships have been used for many centuries, and are 
> known to be viable. One day man-missions will be viable, but I think more 
> needs to be done.  There are no Titanics under different names - we know 
> ships can sink and there is nothing that can be done about that at present. 
> They are looking for making them unsinkable, but they do not keep promising 
> unsinkables as the  Titanic, they are otherwise a safe bet, even so.
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> Why do the nations conspire and the peoples plot in vain?  The kings of the 
> earth take their stand and the rulers gather together against the Lord and 
> against His Annointed One.
> 
> Psalms 2:1,2 
> 
> 
> 
> Community email addresses:
>   Post message: [email protected]
>   Subscribe:    [email protected]
>   Unsubscribe:  [email protected]
>   List owner:   [email protected]
>    
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.