Re: New shuttle
rsetzer <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.all-chat |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
And you miss my point. You are tunnel visioned in on one spectacular event and pointing to it and shouting Ah-Ha, proof that risk is wrong. Mark Collins wrote: > Mark: No, I'm saying that the Titanic sank and they never built another > like > >>it. IT was not supposed to sink, but it did. > > > But they did, and you ignore that. The ocean is full of Titanics. They > just have different names. > > Mark: You miss my point. Ships have been used for many centuries, and are > known to be viable. One day man-missions will be viable, but I think more > needs to be done. There are no Titanics under different names - we know > ships can sink and there is nothing that can be done about that at present. > They are looking for making them unsinkable, but they do not keep promising > unsinkables as the Titanic, they are otherwise a safe bet, even so. > > Mark > > > Why do the nations conspire and the peoples plot in vain? The kings of the > earth take their stand and the rulers gather together against the Lord and > against His Annointed One. > > Psalms 2:1,2 > > > > Community email addresses: > Post message: [email protected] > Subscribe: [email protected] > Unsubscribe: [email protected] > List owner: [email protected] > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > >