Re: We are winning the war... aren't we???

"Deepak Mohoni" <[email protected]> Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:59:45 +0530
Newsgroups gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.all-chat
Message-ID <005c01c6bd6b$d39d4e90$0500a8c0@IBM>
Bill,

The problem is that the enemy does not have any specific turf. And there are probably far fewer terrorists than there appear to be (otherwise we would have terrorist attacks every other day) but they are scattered all over the world. 

Still, a lot of the logistics seem to take place in Pakistan (the British and American press says so, but who really knows?). However, Pakistan is the number one ally in the war against terror, so you can't really go in there and try to nail the perpetrators. Also, quite a bit of the funding comes from Saudi Arabia, but they are also everyone's friends, so you can't go after them either.

The upshot is that the visible Muslims - most of whom are certainly not involved in terror - become hate objects in non-Muslim countries like yours and mine, making recruitment easier for the real terrorists.

Cheers,
Deepak




  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: William Highfield 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 10:01 PM
  Subject: Re: [CAT23-Achat] We are winning the war... aren't we???


  I love hearing about people that are "surprised" at the arrests in Great 
  Britain.

  The only way you could be "surprised" about those arrests is if you're 
  an absolute moron.

  The war on terror will continue whether we fight back or not. I 
  strongly suggest our best
  course of action is not to just fight back, but to continue to take the 
  fight to the enemy's home turf.

  Better to make the war zone there than London, New York or LA.

  -- 
  Bill Highfield
  St Cloud, Florida, USA!

  Top Choice Videos and Music
  ~12,000VHS ~4,000DVD ~2,000CD in stock!
  We special order & We ship ANYWHERE!



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]