Re: Adjudication Question
"David E. Cohen" <[email protected]> Sat, 06 Nov 2004 09:32:41 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.cat23.gm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001901c4c40d$78e810b0$a982bb18@Dell> |
The question did not say which version of the rules were being used. I always assume the most recent. Why it is so tough to get a complete and logical set of rules is beyond me. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter J Richardson" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 6:05 AM Subject: Re: [CAT23-GM] Adjudication Question > > It is explicit in the earlier version of the rules that support is to a space rather than to a coast. The 2000 rules > muddy the waters like they do in so many areas. > > Regards > Peter > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 6:42 PM > Subject: Re: [CAT23-GM] Adjudication Question > > > > > > It is not explicitly set forth in the rules. I believe, though, that most GMs would rule it a valid support > order. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: squirelibbymcafee <[email protected]> > > Date: Thursday, November 4, 2004 1:30 pm > > Subject: [CAT23-GM] Adjudication Question > > > > > > > > > > > Is the support order valid? > > > > > > F MAO support F W MED to Spain > > > F W MED to Spain (SC) > > > > > > Libby ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/7tRolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~->