SV: Adjudication question

Sure does... And if I'd had my wits around when I adjudicated, I thin kI
would have gotten to the same result myself - without confusing myself more
than absolutely necessary ;)

Thanx for the help to all of you!

:) JEsper


-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: Yoav Haberman [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sendt: 11. november 2004 00:52
Til: [email protected]; [email protected]
Emne: RE: [CAT23-GM] Adjudication question


Hi Jesper,

A unit can not cut a support order that is directed against itself.
So the supports stays valid, and MAO indeed gets dislodged.

Hope this clear up the situation :-)

Yours,
Yoav

>From: "Jesper" <[email protected]>
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: <[email protected]>
>Subject: [CAT23-GM] Adjudication question
>Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 23:55:24 +0100
>
>Hi there
>
>I've got a situation in the Med...
>
>Player 1:
>F NaF - MAO
>F WES S (F NaF - MAO)
>F TYS S F WES
>
>Player 2:
>F Spa(sc) S (F MAO - WES)
>F MAO - WES
>
>Realpolitik adjudicates P1:"F NaF - MAO" succeeds, dislodging F MAO. But if
>were adjudicating by hand, I would have started by letting the order P2:"F
>MAO - WES" cut the support P1:"F NaF - MAO" unsuccesfull. Then, P2:"MAO -
>WES" bounces with the P1 fleet in WES (both units supported by one), 
>leaving
>everyone where they started...
>
>Am I or Realpolitik mistaken?
>
>
>:) Jesper
>

_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! 
http://toolbar.msn.com/