Re: (Game Queue)

Yah. Some are trying to change too many things too fast. And I believe 
we should first get the basic thing going and leave other innovations 
for later, and only if there is a reasonable consensus.

The system (human GMs, public calls for new games) has worked fine so 
far and the main problem we seem to have is that we are hard to find 
since the original Cat23 portal site was recycled into something else.

First let's get the new portal finished (great job so far, btw) and keep 
the discussion on other innovations (say: forum, judge, queue, more 
lists...) going but as a separate thing. Trying to cramp it all together 
at the same time spells confusion. Step by step and with due consensus 
is better.

Regards,
Luis.

David E. Cohen wrote:

> I don't think a queue is necessary or a variant yahoogroup is 
> necessary. I
> like having all the traffic on one Ngame list. One-stop shopping, as it
> were.
>
> We should only be so lucky that Cat23 gets busy enough for it to need 
> to be
> split.
>
> -
>
> .
>
>  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]