Re: Re: What chance of an update to the Diplomatic Pouch sites?
Mike Barnes <[email protected]> Sat, 18 Jun 2011 18:07:30 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.judge.dp.discussion |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Good point Thorin, I understand Manus has a plan to "SIGNON" and "SET ABSENCE" using the web interface. Mike. On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 3:43 AM, thorinmunro <[email protected]>wrote: > ** > > > Able to contribute from the point of view of a player and active gamemaster > here over the last six years. I'm not a programmer of anything! > > Recently discovered that long past players may still think playing on the > dpjudge means using 'primitive' email commands and getting game results as > text. The gent I was speaking to had never found the excellent dpjudge web > interface. > > Thorin > > > --- In [email protected], "woelpad" <woelpad@...> wrote: > > > > > > If there's going to be a council, I want to be part of it. Any coding > that needs to happen, you can probably entrust it to me as good as to Manus. > Of course, now that DPjudge is now opensourced, anyone can participate. Or > did I speak too fast there? (Did this ever get announced?) > > > > Integration is a good word. I have been focusing so far on game play, but > all the community aspects certainly deserve attention. Any pointers as to > how you envision that are welcome. We don't want to create a Bounced clone, > I think, so try to stay close to the DPjudge philosophy: "Simple and > flexible." Right, Manus? > > > > Mario. > > > > > > --- In [email protected], Chris Babcock <cbabcock@> wrote: > > > > > > I wonder how many (few?) people realize that the Pouch and the DPJudge > > > are on different machines. The technology isn't too hard to put it > > > all together, but the performance and reliability wouldn't be too good > > > unless both were on the same network. I'd estimate the price tag for > > > this wish list to be $800/year plus labor. > > > > > > If the Pouch competes with the nJudges and other servers by being more > > > closely coupled with USDP then that diminishes its ability to serve > > > the hobby as a whole because it will be harder to get content and > > > visitors from those "other" sites. Also, going vertical would mean > > > giving up on the idea of there being more judges using the DPJudge > > > software. So this wishlist would be a win for USDP, but a loss for the > > > DPJudge platform and The Pouch, in my opinion. > > > > > > There are ways to rope me into contributing, but I'm not going to tell > > > Manus what they are. ;) > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:32 PM, thorinmunro <thorinmunro@> wrote: > > > > On my wishlist for an improved Diplomatic Pouch > > > > - simple home page with easy access for new players and viewing of > new and in progress games, results, etc > > > > - inhouse tournament functions and player rankings > > > > - more active forum, > > > > > > > >