Re: Fw: [wm2002-results] WM02FINL Game End Proposal

"Adam P. Silverman" <agman1010-/[email protected]> Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:16:25 -0000
Newsgroups gmane.games.diplomacy.worldmasters.chat.wm2002
Message-ID <[email protected]>

As the wimp who proposed the Russian solo, I'd like to protest being=20
called a wimp.  Err...

Let me just say that, after all, it was giving up after 1903 in my=20
previous games that got me this far, so why not see where it gets me=20
this time.=20=20

Come on now, we all know its not going to pass.  Over?  Its not=20
over.  Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?  No.  This=20
isnt over.

-Adam

--- In [email protected], "Peter J Richardson" <pjrich@n...>=20
wrote:
> Somebody wants to throw in the towel in a *final* in 1903?
>=20
> What wimps. :-)
>=20
> Regards
> Peter
>=20
>=20
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: "Paul Riley" <paul.riley@s...>
> To: "'Adam Silverman'" <agman@s...>; "'Bruce Mount'"=20
<brucemount@a...>; "'Eelco van Duijnhoven'"
> <e.duijnhoven@c...>; "'Itamar Laserson'"=20
<itlaserson@h...>; "'Jonathon Laserson'"
> <jonilaserson@h...>; "'Julio Pereira'" <julio@b...>; "'Paul=20
Riley'" <paul.riley@s...>;
> "'Robert K=F6hnen'" <koehnen@u...>; "'Rudi van Hal'"=20
<r.a.j.vanhal@c...>; "'Steve Langdon'"
> <swlangdon@y...>; "'WM2002 Results'" <wm2002-
[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 9:34 PM
> Subject: [wm2002-results] WM02FINL Game End Proposal
>=20
>=20
> >
> > There has been a proposal to concede a solo to Russia.
> >
> > Votes must be submitted by the F03A deadline, which will be=20
Friday night,
> > some time around 21:30 GMT.
> >
> > So that everyone is clear on the rules...
> >
> > (1) Voting Rules:
> >
> > All players remaining in the game must agree upon a proposal=20
unanimously. A
> > single negative vote will defeat the proposal. Either an=20
abstention or an
> > unclear vote counts as a negative vote and defeats the proposal,=20
except for
> > a game end proposal when the vote deadline coincides with a=20
movement
> > deadline and the player also NMRs, in which case an uncast vote=20
will be
> > deemed to be a vote in favour of the proposal. Where a vote is=20
sufficiently
> > vague as to make its intent unclear then the GM will treat it as=20
an uncast
> > vote.
> >
> > P
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >





=20