Re: Fw: [wm2002-results] WM02FINL Game End Proposal
"Adam P. Silverman" <agman1010-/[email protected]> Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:16:25 -0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.worldmasters.chat.wm2002 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
As the wimp who proposed the Russian solo, I'd like to protest being=20 called a wimp. Err... Let me just say that, after all, it was giving up after 1903 in my=20 previous games that got me this far, so why not see where it gets me=20 this time.=20=20 Come on now, we all know its not going to pass. Over? Its not=20 over. Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? No. This=20 isnt over. -Adam --- In [email protected], "Peter J Richardson" <pjrich@n...>=20 wrote: > Somebody wants to throw in the towel in a *final* in 1903? >=20 > What wimps. :-) >=20 > Regards > Peter >=20 >=20 >=20 > ----- Original Message -----=20 > From: "Paul Riley" <paul.riley@s...> > To: "'Adam Silverman'" <agman@s...>; "'Bruce Mount'"=20 <brucemount@a...>; "'Eelco van Duijnhoven'" > <e.duijnhoven@c...>; "'Itamar Laserson'"=20 <itlaserson@h...>; "'Jonathon Laserson'" > <jonilaserson@h...>; "'Julio Pereira'" <julio@b...>; "'Paul=20 Riley'" <paul.riley@s...>; > "'Robert K=F6hnen'" <koehnen@u...>; "'Rudi van Hal'"=20 <r.a.j.vanhal@c...>; "'Steve Langdon'" > <swlangdon@y...>; "'WM2002 Results'" <wm2002- [email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 9:34 PM > Subject: [wm2002-results] WM02FINL Game End Proposal >=20 >=20 > > > > There has been a proposal to concede a solo to Russia. > > > > Votes must be submitted by the F03A deadline, which will be=20 Friday night, > > some time around 21:30 GMT. > > > > So that everyone is clear on the rules... > > > > (1) Voting Rules: > > > > All players remaining in the game must agree upon a proposal=20 unanimously. A > > single negative vote will defeat the proposal. Either an=20 abstention or an > > unclear vote counts as a negative vote and defeats the proposal,=20 except for > > a game end proposal when the vote deadline coincides with a=20 movement > > deadline and the player also NMRs, in which case an uncast vote=20 will be > > deemed to be a vote in favour of the proposal. Where a vote is=20 sufficiently > > vague as to make its intent unclear then the GM will treat it as=20 an uncast > > vote. > > > > P > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > =20