Re: Re: Fw: [wm2002-results] WM02FINL Game End Proposal

Ah, the famous 'do not see me roadkill' strategy. Many a time has this
devious form of camoflage saved me from certain death.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adam P. Silverman" <agman1010-/[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 6:16 PM
Subject: [wm02-chat] Re: Fw: [wm2002-results] WM02FINL Game End Proposal




As the wimp who proposed the Russian solo, I'd like to protest being
called a wimp.  Err...

Let me just say that, after all, it was giving up after 1903 in my
previous games that got me this far, so why not see where it gets me
this time.

Come on now, we all know its not going to pass.  Over?  Its not
over.  Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor?  No.  This
isnt over.

-Adam

--- In [email protected], "Peter J Richardson" <pjrich@n...>
wrote:
> Somebody wants to throw in the towel in a *final* in 1903?
>
> What wimps. :-)
>
> Regards
> Peter
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Paul Riley" <paul.riley@s...>
> To: "'Adam Silverman'" <agman@s...>; "'Bruce Mount'"
<brucemount@a...>; "'Eelco van Duijnhoven'"
> <e.duijnhoven@c...>; "'Itamar Laserson'"
<itlaserson@h...>; "'Jonathon Laserson'"
> <jonilaserson@h...>; "'Julio Pereira'" <julio@b...>; "'Paul
Riley'" <paul.riley@s...>;
> "'Robert Köhnen'" <koehnen@u...>; "'Rudi van Hal'"
<r.a.j.vanhal@c...>; "'Steve Langdon'"
> <swlangdon@y...>; "'WM2002 Results'" <wm2002-
[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 9:34 PM
> Subject: [wm2002-results] WM02FINL Game End Proposal
>
>
> >
> > There has been a proposal to concede a solo to Russia.
> >
> > Votes must be submitted by the F03A deadline, which will be
Friday night,
> > some time around 21:30 GMT.
> >
> > So that everyone is clear on the rules...
> >
> > (1) Voting Rules:
> >
> > All players remaining in the game must agree upon a proposal
unanimously. A
> > single negative vote will defeat the proposal. Either an
abstention or an
> > unclear vote counts as a negative vote and defeats the proposal,
except for
> > a game end proposal when the vote deadline coincides with a
movement
> > deadline and the player also NMRs, in which case an uncast vote
will be
> > deemed to be a vote in favour of the proposal. Where a vote is
sufficiently
> > vague as to make its intent unclear then the GM will treat it as
an uncast
> > vote.
> >
> > P
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >






Yahoo! Groups Links