Re: Re: Fw: [wm2002-results] WM02FINL Game End Proposal
"mczet" <[email protected]> Fri, 7 Jan 2005 09:59:10 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.diplomacy.worldmasters.chat.wm2002 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00e601c4f4d1$d396bcb0$6900a8c0@ACCOUNTING> |
They stopped to refuel in Jersy, Chicago, Denver, and San Fran. ----- Original Message ----- From: "bcranie" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 9:36 AM Subject: Re: [wm02-chat] Re: Fw: [wm2002-results] WM02FINL Game End Proposal >>Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbour? Sneaky Luftwaffe :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: Adam P. Silverman To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 12:16 AM Subject: [wm02-chat] Re: Fw: [wm2002-results] WM02FINL Game End Proposal As the wimp who proposed the Russian solo, I'd like to protest being called a wimp. Err... Let me just say that, after all, it was giving up after 1903 in my previous games that got me this far, so why not see where it gets me this time. Come on now, we all know its not going to pass. Over? Its not over. Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? No. This isnt over. -Adam --- In [email protected], "Peter J Richardson" <pjrich@n...> wrote: > Somebody wants to throw in the towel in a *final* in 1903? > > What wimps. :-) > > Regards > Peter > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Paul Riley" <paul.riley@s...> > To: "'Adam Silverman'" <agman@s...>; "'Bruce Mount'" <brucemount@a...>; "'Eelco van Duijnhoven'" > <e.duijnhoven@c...>; "'Itamar Laserson'" <itlaserson@h...>; "'Jonathon Laserson'" > <jonilaserson@h...>; "'Julio Pereira'" <julio@b...>; "'Paul Riley'" <paul.riley@s...>; > "'Robert Köhnen'" <koehnen@u...>; "'Rudi van Hal'" <r.a.j.vanhal@c...>; "'Steve Langdon'" > <swlangdon@y...>; "'WM2002 Results'" <wm2002- [email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 9:34 PM > Subject: [wm2002-results] WM02FINL Game End Proposal > > > > > > There has been a proposal to concede a solo to Russia. > > > > Votes must be submitted by the F03A deadline, which will be Friday night, > > some time around 21:30 GMT. > > > > So that everyone is clear on the rules... > > > > (1) Voting Rules: > > > > All players remaining in the game must agree upon a proposal unanimously. A > > single negative vote will defeat the proposal. Either an abstention or an > > unclear vote counts as a negative vote and defeats the proposal, except for > > a game end proposal when the vote deadline coincides with a movement > > deadline and the player also NMRs, in which case an uncast vote will be > > deemed to be a vote in favour of the proposal. Where a vote is sufficiently > > vague as to make its intent unclear then the GM will treat it as an uncast > > vote. > > > > P > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Yahoo! Groups Links a.. To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wm02-chat/ b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.