Re: The endless influx of low-quality, low-realism, quantity-over-quality aircraft into FGAddon
David Hudach <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.flightgear.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAJeoFaLCMLk3t4eHQcK6g_qPr4aWJ1jBqTDaJbuVDLi6xQL6fw@mail.gmail.com> |
Though I can understand the frustration, contributions come in many forms. To some, rolling up sleeves means coding. But to others it could mean flying the planes, using the software, doing some genuine analysis, paying close attention to the user experience and maybe more importantly, separating the user experience from the developer point of view. I would think by now most in this forum know the difference between someone making demands and someone engaging in a serious discussion, no matter how contentious it might become because my guess is you will sense that they are striving to improve the product, or whatever someone wants to call it. If someone can ask "define realism" then I'll ask "define rolling up sleeves." Someone with a valid, well thought out idea may not be a programmer, designer or have any of the skills that YOU have. But it doesn't mean they haven't done the work, rolled up their sleeves. If the mere suggestion by someone who can't do what you do means their ideas should simply be dismissed out of hand, then you are simply going to end up coding this FG yourself in a vacuum. And if that's what you want, you are on the proper path. On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 1:30 AM Erik Hofman <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/25/26 23:15, Willie Fleming wrote: > > Sorry Wayne, its attitudes like you have just expressed that will ensure > > this project will continue to shrink and the forums become even more of > > a bubble. > > Yours is a recipe for long slow decline .and ever more inward thinking. > > Well, we've had out fair share of of enthousiast coming by for the first > time, proposing what has to be changed and why and then relying on the > handful of developers to do the real work. Most of them left out of > frustration that nobody listened. While the reality is that those who > could do it are already overwhelmed with work, life and, in their spare > time, other FlightGear problems. > > I'm past the point where I care whether an individual user stays or not. > If they have ideas then they have to put up their sleeves and get to > work on it themselves. And then the other developers will be glad to > help out where they can. > > Erik > > > -- > http://adalin.com > High performance audio scenegraph and sound simulation. > > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel