Re: Is it okay to remove half of FlightGear wiki to make it easier to process by AI?

"Frederic T." <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.games.flightgear.devel
Message-ID <CABg8F9Q6tZYt6xCPzqOWL7tZ5BLiic3arLJo+CNddv-V9ZtXXA@mail.gmail.com>
Especially we need a better captcha system - currently we have a question
that needs to be answered in a textbox, and so far I've only seen two
different questions.

Am Mo., 10. Aug. 2026 um 11:33 Uhr schrieb Alan Teeder <
[email protected]>:

> Is there any reason why we do not have a more secure sign-on system for
> wiki contributors? Perhaps as simple as a list of authorised wiki editors
> that only the maintainers can access.?
> On 10/08/2026 10:16, James Turner wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10 Aug 2026, at 10:50, Gijs de Rooy <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I do wonder if a roll-back might be justified, if people are going to use
> tools, they can re-run those tools…
>
> Sure, but there have been edits, uploads etc. by others (not using any
> tools) that I don't want to loose.
>
>
> I thought we were only talking about  24-48 hour window, maybe I have
> misunderstood?
>
> Kind regards,
> James
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-devel mailing [email protected]://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.