Re: Is it okay to remove half of FlightGear wiki to make it easier to process by AI?
"Frederic T." <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.flightgear.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABg8F9Q6tZYt6xCPzqOWL7tZ5BLiic3arLJo+CNddv-V9ZtXXA@mail.gmail.com> |
Especially we need a better captcha system - currently we have a question that needs to be answered in a textbox, and so far I've only seen two different questions. Am Mo., 10. Aug. 2026 um 11:33 Uhr schrieb Alan Teeder < [email protected]>: > Is there any reason why we do not have a more secure sign-on system for > wiki contributors? Perhaps as simple as a list of authorised wiki editors > that only the maintainers can access.? > On 10/08/2026 10:16, James Turner wrote: > > > > On 10 Aug 2026, at 10:50, Gijs de Rooy <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I do wonder if a roll-back might be justified, if people are going to use > tools, they can re-run those tools… > > Sure, but there have been edits, uploads etc. by others (not using any > tools) that I don't want to loose. > > > I thought we were only talking about 24-48 hour window, maybe I have > misunderstood? > > Kind regards, > James > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing [email protected]://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel