Re: Is it okay to remove half of FlightGear wiki to make it easier to process by AI?

That won't help. This guy genuinely believes AI Wiki is a good thing. He'll just defeat the captcha.

--
Josh Davidson
________________________________
From: Frederic T. <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2026 04:35
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; FlightGear developers discussions <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Is it okay to remove half of FlightGear wiki to make it easier to process by AI?

Especially we need a better captcha system - currently we have a question that needs to be answered in a textbox, and so far I've only seen two different questions.

Am Mo., 10. Aug. 2026 um 11:33 Uhr schrieb Alan Teeder <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:

Is there any reason why we do not have a more secure sign-on system for wiki contributors? Perhaps as simple as a list of authorised wiki editors that only the maintainers can access.?

On 10/08/2026 10:16, James Turner wrote:


On 10 Aug 2026, at 10:50, Gijs de Rooy <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

I do wonder if a roll-back might be justified, if people are going to use tools, they can re-run those tools…
Sure, but there have been edits, uploads etc. by others (not using any tools) that I don't want to loose.

I thought we were only talking about  24-48 hour window, maybe I have misunderstood?

Kind regards,
James






_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel