Re: Contra-rotating props in YASim
Lee Elliott <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.flightgear.flightmodel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday 10 December 2004 22:22, Andy Ross wrote: > Lee Elliott wrote: > > Will there be any benefit in specifying both props in each > > contra pair? Will it even work effectively? > > Yes, it will work. Under normal circumstances, the aircraft > will be symmetric due to the multiple engines anyway, so you > won't notice a difference. But engine-out performance will be > different between a (missing) single prop on one side and the > loss of a contrarotating pair. > > > If I do include both sets of props in each pair I think I'll > > have to specify a separate turbine engine for each one and > > if this is so, can I simply 'halve' each engine i.e. halve > > the power etc? > > Yes. Although then the two engines will have differing state > -- it would be possible to "stop" one and not the other, which > is nonsensical. > > Maybe the simplest way to handle this in code would be to add > a new boolean to a propeller, called "contra-pair" or whatnot, > which indicates to YASim that the propeller is a > couter-rotating pair. The moment of inertia would still be > used to compute rotational acceleration, but would be ignored > as a component of the internal gyro vector of the aircraft. > This would be very easy. > > Andy Dear Santa, I've tried to be really good all year so what I would like for Xmas is a little change to YASim. Apparently it would be very easy to do... :) LeeE _______________________________________________ Flightgear-flightmodel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-flightmodel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d