Re: Contra-rotating props in YASim

Lee Elliott <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.games.flightgear.flightmodel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Friday 10 December 2004 22:22, Andy Ross wrote:
> Lee Elliott wrote:
> > Will there be any benefit in specifying both props in each
> > contra pair?  Will it even work effectively?
>
> Yes, it will work.  Under normal circumstances, the aircraft
> will be symmetric due to the multiple engines anyway, so you
> won't notice a difference.  But engine-out performance will be
> different between a (missing) single prop on one side and the
> loss of a contrarotating pair.
>
> > If I do include both sets of props in each pair I think I'll
> > have to specify a separate turbine engine for each one and
> > if this is so, can I simply 'halve' each engine i.e. halve
> > the power etc?
>
> Yes.  Although then the two engines will have differing state
> -- it would be possible to "stop" one and not the other, which
> is nonsensical.
>
> Maybe the simplest way to handle this in code would be to add
> a new boolean to a propeller, called "contra-pair" or whatnot,
> which indicates to YASim that the propeller is a
> couter-rotating pair.  The moment of inertia would still be
> used to compute rotational acceleration, but would be ignored
> as a component of the internal gyro vector of the aircraft. 
> This would be very easy.
>
> Andy


Dear Santa,

I've tried to be really good all year so what I would like for 
Xmas is a little change to YASim.  Apparently it would be very 
easy to do...

:)

LeeE

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-flightmodel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-flightmodel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.