Re: map fairness test

"Per I. Mathisen" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.games.freeciv.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, 26 Dec 2003, Horn G=E1bor wrote:
> Good idea. I think it doesn't depend on the pubserver admins, but the
> players. We'd need hundreds of exisiting good quality maps to use them
> w/o they became boring. If we'll have them (who wanna work on it?:),

I've noted that in all the RTS games I've played where pubserver-like
gameplay was offered, competitive games nearly always happened on a narrow
selection 2-3 different maps, even though hundreds of different maps may
exist. Knowing the map well in advance is a huge tactical advantage, and
nobody wants to risk their enemy knowing the map substantially better than
themselves. There is a lot of "safe bet" involved - everybody knows the
big 3 - so more people are likely to join such a map, while less common
maps draw less people.

  - Per
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.