Re: unit stacking
Peter Schaefer <[email protected]> Sun, 28 Aug 2005 01:32:15 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.freeciv.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On the other hand, did it make sense that Hannibals little army destroyed 8 half-assed Roman legions at the battle of Cannae? ;-) On 8/28/05, Sam Steingold <sds-mXXj517/[email protected]> wrote: > It makes sense that sinking a transport kills all its passengers. > One can argue that sinking a carrier should sink all its aircraft > (I would argue that this should leave the aircraft in the air with the > requirement of landing at the end of the turn). >=20 > It does not make any sense that 20 riflemen on one tile (non-fortress, > non-city) can be destroyed by a single armor attack because the top > riflemen unit is killed in the attack. >=20 > The MOO1 ship stacking makes much more sense to me. >=20 > -- > Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k > <http://www.openvotingconsortium.org/> <http://www.iris.org.il> > <http://www.camera.org> <http://ffii.org/> <http://www.savegushkatif.org> > If abortion is murder, then oral sex is cannibalism. >=20 >=20 >=20 >