gtk vs qt accelerators.
Marko Lindqvist <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.games.freeciv.internationalization |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAF6bG8eHXgFiyh_t+wNq5rvN9ZDE-_dezdPwGw2spRMsHyRCUg@mail.gmail.com> |
There's a S2_5 bug report that seems to be related to translations, reported specifically against fr.po: http://gna.org/bugs/index.php?23008 The problem is that gtk and qt use different syntax to mark accelerators. As long as the original texts have accelerators, there are client specific msgstrs differing by the accelerator. Strings that do not have accelerators in the original text, are identical between the clients and thus currently have only one msgstr. The problem is when the translation adds accelerator suitable for one client but not the other to such a string. At least in some cases accelerators are pointless in that the activities already have another key combination assigned. Would you translators prefer that such strings get qualified by the gui -> same string needs to be translated separately for both clients, or that it's forbidden to add accelerators to them? - ML _______________________________________________ Freeciv-i18n mailing list Freeciv-i18n-8nu/[email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-i18n