Re: gtk vs qt accelerators.

Hello all,

To me the simplest solution would be to forbid the added accelerators - 
no work for developers, none for most translators also (at least, those 
that did not introduce such accelerators).

I'll try and suppress all remaining accelerators I left in the French 
translation.

Best regards,


Le 30/01/2015 08:22, Marko Lindqvist a écrit :
> There's a S2_5 bug report that seems to be related to translations,
> reported specifically against fr.po:
> http://gna.org/bugs/index.php?23008
>
> The problem is that gtk and qt use different syntax to mark
> accelerators. As long as the original texts have accelerators, there
> are client specific msgstrs differing by the accelerator. Strings that
> do not have accelerators in the original text, are identical between
> the clients and thus currently have only one msgstr. The problem is
> when the translation adds accelerator suitable for one client but not
> the other to such a string.
> At least in some cases accelerators are pointless in that the
> activities already have another key combination assigned.
> Would you translators prefer that such strings get qualified by the
> gui -> same string needs to be translated separately for both clients,
> or that it's forbidden to add accelerators to them?
>
>
>   - ML
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeciv-i18n mailing list
> Freeciv-i18n-8nu/[email protected]
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-i18n
>
>
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Igx, The Dreaming Drummer...*([email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>)
> Freeciv French translator

_______________________________________________
Freeciv-i18n mailing list
Freeciv-i18n-8nu/[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-i18n