Re: : Issue: Error in Radius VSA to Diameter Vendor AVP conversion in NASREQ
"David Mitton" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.aaa |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yes, that was noted by Glen Zorn recently. I will fix it when it pops up on the RFC Editor's queue. Dave. ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: [AAA-WG]: Issue: Error in Radius VSA to Diameter Vendor AVP conversion in NASREQ Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:23:04 +0200 > > Issue TBD: Error in Radius VSA to Diameter Vendor AVP conversion in NASREQ > Submitter name: Mikko Aittola > Submitter email address: [email protected] > Date first submitted: 14.12.2004 > Reference: > Document: nasreq > Comment type: T > Priority: > Section: 9.6.2 > Rationale/Explanation of issue: > > According to Section 9.6.2. in NASREQ Diameter AVP length field includes > padding. According to RFC 3588 AVP length field does not include > padding. > > Text from NASREQ: > > 9.6.2. Forwarding a RADIUS VSA to a Diameter Vendor AVP > > > > > > The Diameter AVP will consist of the following fields; > > Diameter Flags: V=1, M=0, P=0 > > Diameter Vendor code = RADIUS VSA Vendor code > > Diameter AVP code = RADIUS VSA Vendor type code > > Diameter AVP length = length of AVP (header + data + padding) > > Diameter Data = RADIUS VSA vendor data > > > Requested change: > Diameter AVP length = length of AVP (header + data) > > > BR, > Mikko