Re: : Issue: Error in Radius VSA to Diameter Vendor AVP conversion in NASREQ

"David Mitton" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.aaa
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Yes, that was noted by Glen Zorn recently.
I will fix it when it pops up on the RFC Editor's queue.

Dave.
----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [AAA-WG]: Issue: Error in Radius VSA to Diameter Vendor AVP conversion in NASREQ
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 14:23:04 +0200

> 
> Issue TBD: Error in Radius VSA to Diameter Vendor AVP conversion in NASREQ
> Submitter name: Mikko Aittola
> Submitter email address: [email protected]
> Date first submitted: 14.12.2004
> Reference:
> Document: nasreq
> Comment type: T
> Priority:
> Section: 9.6.2
> Rationale/Explanation of issue:
> 
> According to Section 9.6.2. in NASREQ Diameter AVP length field includes
> padding. According to RFC 3588 AVP length field does not include
> padding.
> 
> Text from NASREQ:
> > 9.6.2.  Forwarding a RADIUS VSA to a Diameter Vendor AVP
> >
> >
> >   The Diameter AVP will consist of the following fields;
> >      Diameter Flags: V=1, M=0, P=0
> >      Diameter Vendor code = RADIUS VSA Vendor code
> >      Diameter AVP code = RADIUS VSA Vendor type code
> >      Diameter AVP length = length of AVP (header + data + padding)
> >      Diameter Data = RADIUS VSA vendor data
> 
> 
> Requested change:
>        Diameter AVP length = length of AVP (header + data)
> 
> 
> BR,
> Mikko
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.